On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:49:12PM +0200, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > Le 31/07/2025 à 15:26, Maxime Ripard a écrit : > > Hi Louis, > > > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 03:04:49PM +0200, Louis Chauvet wrote: > > > Le 30/07/2025 à 10:57, Maxime Ripard a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The tidss driver rolls its own API equivalent to the FIELD_* API already > > > > provided the kernel. > > > > > > > > Since it's an ad-hoc implementation, it also is less convenient and > > > > doesn't provide some useful features like being able to share the field > > > > definitions that will come handy in the future. > > > > > > > > Thus, this series converts the driver to that API and drops its own > > > > version. > > > > > > I just saw your series after sending mine [2]. I checked, there is only > > > one > > > minor conflict that can be easly fixed. > > > > > > But when applied on drm-misc/drm-misc-next, your series raises: > > > > > > In file included from <command-line>: > > > drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c: In function 'FLD_MOD': > > > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:568:45: error: call to > > > '__compiletime_assert_589' declared with attribute error: FIELD_PREP: mask > > > is not constant > > > 568 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, > > > __compiletime_assert_, > > > __COUNTER__) > > > | ^ > > > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:549:25: note: in definition of macro > > > '__compiletime_assert' > > > 549 | prefix ## suffix(); \ > > > | ^~~~~~ > > > ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:568:9: note: in expansion of macro > > > '_compiletime_assert' > > > 568 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, > > > __compiletime_assert_, > > > __COUNTER__) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ./include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro > > > 'compiletime_assert' > > > 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), > > > msg) > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ./include/linux/bitfield.h:65:17: note: in expansion of macro > > > 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG' > > > 65 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask), > > > \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > ./include/linux/bitfield.h:115:17: note: in expansion of macro > > > '__BF_FIELD_CHECK' > > > 115 | __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, 0ULL, _val, "FIELD_PREP: > > > "); > > > \ > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_dispc.c:599:33: note: in expansion of macro > > > 'FIELD_PREP' > > > 599 | return (orig & ~mask) | FIELD_PREP(mask, val); > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > This seems to be a limitation of FIELD_PREP [1]. > > > I think the only way to avoid this issue is to use macros and not > > > functions. > > > > > > [1]:https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16/source/include/linux/bitfield.h#L65-L66 > > > [2]:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250730-fix-edge-handling-v1-0-1bdfb3fe7...@bootlin.com/ > > > > Weird, it compiles without warning for me here. Which compiler do you use? > > > I use this one: > > aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 14.2.1 20240912 (Red Hat Cross 14.2.1-2) > Copyright (C) 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO > warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
I was testing with clang, but I can indeed see it with gcc. I'll fix it. Thanks! Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature