> We user space folks have been convinced at this point that the sRGB EOTF > is actually gamma 2.2, and not the piece-wise function. Now, if the > hardware is actually the piece-wise, then that's what should be exposed, > but I'm a bit unsure if we should do that under the name sRGB EOTF. Maybe simply rename the enum string to "sRGB piece-wise EOTF"? In hindsight, the naming of "srgb" in the Wayland protocol caused a lot of confusion, it's better to be explicit about it where possible.
- Re: [PATCH V11 06/47] drm/colorop: Add 1D Curve subtype Xaver Hugl