On 8/21/25 11:02, Matt Coster wrote:
> On 20/08/2025 18:08, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 at 10:56, Michal Wilczynski
>>> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_POWER_SEQUENCING) */
>>
>> Yeah, this looks really messy to me.
>>
>> If there is something missing in the pwrseq interface to make this
>> simpler, let's add that instead of having to keep this if/def hacks
>> around.
>
> Agreed (now that I've actually done my homework), I see no reason to
> keep the IS_ENABLED(...) checks around.
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
Thank you both for the feedback, I haven't noticed that there are stubs
already. Will re-roll the patchset.
>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Other than the if/def hacks, I think this looks good to me!
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
>
Best regards,
--
Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczyn...@samsung.com>
