Hi,
在 2025/8/27 16:30, Ben Horgan 写道:
Hi Zihuan,
On 8/27/25 03:31, Zihuan Zhang wrote:
Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 5d07ee85bdae..e3cb6d54f35b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -307,17 +307,16 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
*/
if (!housekeeping_cpu(cpu, HK_TYPE_TICK) ||
time_is_before_jiffies(last_update +
msecs_to_jiffies(AMU_SAMPLE_EXP_MS))) {
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy
__free(put_cpufreq_policy);
Based on the guidance, in include/linux/cleanup.h, I would expect the
assignment to be done on this line.
"...the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
* statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
* function when __free() is used."
The reason I split the assignment into multiple lines is because
scripts/checkpatch.pl gave a warning about the line being too long.
But if you think a single-line assignment is better, I will modify it
accordingly.
int ref_cpu;
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
if (!policy)
return -EINVAL;
if (!cpumask_intersects(policy->related_cpus,
-
housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK))) {
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
+
housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_TICK)))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
for_each_cpu_wrap(ref_cpu, policy->cpus, cpu + 1) {
if (ref_cpu == start_cpu) {
@@ -329,8 +328,6 @@ int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
break;
}
- cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-
if (ref_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
/* No alternative to pull info from */
return -EAGAIN;
Thanks,
Ben
