On Wed,  3 Sep 2025 21:17:27 +0800
Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn> wrote:

> Replace the manual cpufreq_cpu_put() with __free(put_cpufreq_policy)
> annotation for policy references. This reduces the risk of reference
> counting mistakes and aligns the code with the latest kernel style.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzih...@kylinos.cn>
This one is a little more weak wrt to justification.  Kernel style
isn't to use __free() where there isn't a significant benefit.

Up to maintainer of the driver on this one so I'll not offer
a tag.

> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 11 +++++------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c 
> b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> index 7d9a5f656de8..811fdbf398fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> @@ -892,15 +892,15 @@ static int powernv_cpufreq_reboot_notifier(struct 
> notifier_block *nb,
>                               unsigned long action, void *unused)
>  {
>       int cpu;
> -     struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy;
>  
>       rebooting = true;
>       for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> -             cpu_policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +             struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> +                     cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> +
>               if (!cpu_policy)
>                       continue;
>               powernv_cpufreq_target_index(cpu_policy, get_nominal_index());
> -             cpufreq_cpu_put(cpu_policy);
>       }
>  
>       return NOTIFY_DONE;
> @@ -913,7 +913,6 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>  static void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>       struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> -     struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>       unsigned int cpu;
>       cpumask_t mask;
>  
> @@ -928,14 +927,14 @@ static void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>       chip->restore = false;
>       for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>               int index;
> +             struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =
> +                     cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>  
> -             policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>               if (!policy)
>                       continue;
>               index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur, false);
>               powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
>               cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
> -             cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>       }
>  out:
>       cpus_read_unlock();

Reply via email to