On 9/4/2025 8:34 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 05:34:43PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote: >> Add DisplayPort controller for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC. >> While SM6150 currently shares the same configuration as SC7180, >> its hardware capabilities differ. Explicitly listing it ensures clarity >> and avoids potential issues if SC7180 support evolves in the future. >> >> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu....@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git >> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> index >> 9923b065323bbab99de5079b674a0317f3074373..996d0132e084d401db85014a1a4e445d00d62ed8 >> 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dp-controller.yaml >> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ properties: >> - qcom,sc8280xp-dp >> - qcom,sc8280xp-edp >> - qcom,sdm845-dp >> + - qcom,sm6150-dp > The DP MST bindings were A-b'ed and R-b'ed by Rob, so I picked them up > into msm-next-lumag. Please rebase your patchset on top of it and > resend. At this point I'm interested in DP bindings and DP driver > patches, the PHY part can come up separately. > > As for the compatibilities, I think DP on SM6150 should be compatible > with either DP on SDM845 or DP on SM8350. Please choose one which suits > better.
Sure, I’ll split out the DP binding and controller compatible parts into a separate patch series. SDM845 seems not support wide_bus, while SM8350 looks closer to SM6150. But I noticed SM8350 is still configured as SC7180 under dp_display in msm-next-lumag’s top, so this change will mainly about the binding, right? >> - qcom,sm8350-dp >> - qcom,sm8650-dp >> - items: >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >>
