Hi Raphael, Thank you for this patch.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: > Return value for DMA allocation was not checked. Check it and return > error code in case of failing. > > Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <rgallais...@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c > index > 5e9332df21df0db30f10b7a6f5a41cba85c4f7ae..42f21ab91957b38cb9aef012b6ee7f4ae1683edf > 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sti/sti_drv.c > @@ -234,8 +234,11 @@ static int sti_platform_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > struct device_node *node = dev->of_node; > struct device_node *child_np; > struct component_match *match = NULL; > + int ret; > > - dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32)); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > > devm_of_platform_populate(dev); > > > -- > 2.50.1 > Acked-by: Alain Volmat <alain.vol...@foss.st.com> Best regards Alain
