On Mon, 15 Sep 2025, Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > That's not the complete EDID data, though. It's missing 6*16 bytes. If > you go by the hex offsets, 0x100 does not follow 0x090.
Alternatively, there's extra garbage at the end. I'm not really sure what happens because we have no logs, and we discard extension blocks that fail the checksum. (This is something I've been meaning to change no matter what; we shouldn't modify the EDID.) -- Jani Nikula, Intel
