Thanks, I've sent v1 version with added fixes tag. Karol
On 9/15/2025 10:15 PM, Lizhi Hou wrote: > This looks a bug fix. Is adding 'Fixes:' tag better? > > On 9/15/25 03:35, Karol Wachowski wrote: >> Previously, aborting work could return early after engine reset or >> resume >> failure, skipping the necessary runtime_put cleanup leaving the device >> with incorrect reference count breaking runtime power management state. >> >> Replace early returns with goto statements to ensure runtime_put is >> always >> executed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Karol Wachowski <karol.wachow...@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c >> b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c >> index 521b7ac6e35e..044268d0fc87 100644 >> --- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c >> +++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c >> @@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ void ivpu_context_abort_work_fn(struct >> work_struct *work) >> if (vdev->fw->sched_mode == VPU_SCHEDULING_MODE_HW) >> if (ivpu_jsm_reset_engine(vdev, 0)) >> - return; >> + goto runtime_put; >> mutex_lock(&vdev->context_list_lock); >> xa_for_each(&vdev->context_xa, ctx_id, file_priv) { >> @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ void ivpu_context_abort_work_fn(struct >> work_struct *work) >> goto runtime_put; >> if (ivpu_jsm_hws_resume_engine(vdev, 0)) >> - return; >> + goto runtime_put; >> /* >> * In hardware scheduling mode NPU already has stopped >> processing jobs >> * and won't send us any further notifications, thus we have to >> free job related resources