On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 04:00:40PM +0530, Harikrishna Shenoy wrote:
> From: Swapnil Jakhade <sjakh...@cadence.com>
> 
> Add binding changes for DSC(Display Stream Compression) in the MHDP8546
> DPI/DP bridge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Swapnil Jakhade <sjakh...@cadence.com>
> Signed-off-by: Harikrishna Shenoy <h-she...@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml         | 24 ++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git 
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
> index c2b369456e4e..2a05a7d5847f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,mhdp8546.yaml
> @@ -27,13 +27,12 @@ properties:
>            Register block for DSS_EDP0_INTG_CFG_VP registers in case of TI J7 
> SoCs.
>        - description:
>            Register block of mhdptx sapb registers.
> +      - description:
> +          Register block for mhdptx DSC encoder registers.
>  
>    reg-names:
> -    minItems: 1
> -    items:
> -      - const: mhdptx
> -      - const: j721e-intg
> -      - const: mhdptx-sapb
> +    description:
> +      Names corresponding to entries in the reg property.

No, top-level should have broadest constraints. In your case it is
min/maxItems.

Description is completely redundant. Wasn't here before, so why adding
it?

>  
>    clocks:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -100,18 +99,25 @@ allOf:
>        properties:
>          reg:
>            minItems: 2
> -          maxItems: 3
> +          maxItems: 4
>          reg-names:
>            minItems: 2
> -          maxItems: 3
> +          items:
> +            - const: mhdptx
> +            - const: j721e-intg
> +            - const: mhdptx-sapb
> +            - const: dsc
>      else:
>        properties:
>          reg:
>            minItems: 1
> -          maxItems: 2
> +          maxItems: 3
>          reg-names:
>            minItems: 1
> -          maxItems: 2
> +          items:
> +            - const: mhdptx
> +            - const: mhdptx-sapb

This is wrong. Previously CDNS variant had two items means it had
"j721e-intg". Now it's something else.

First, this is an ABI break.

Second, there is no explanation at all for it in the commit msg! Looks
like random change.

Read carefully writing-bindings doc.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Reply via email to