Hello Maud，
At 2025-10-17 15:58:22, "Maud Spierings" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Andy, > >> From: Andy Yan <[email protected]> >> >> Add entry for Innosilicon hdmi bridge library >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Yan <[email protected]> >> --- >> >> (no changes since v1) >> >> MAINTAINERS | 8 ++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index f9f985c7d7479..0adcfb1c264a1 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -12299,6 +12299,14 @@ M: Samuel Holland <[email protected]> >> S: Maintained >> F: drivers/power/supply/ip5xxx_power.c >> >> +INNOSILICON HDMI BRIDGE DRIVER >> +M: Andy Yan <[email protected]> >> +L: [email protected] >> +S: Maintained >> +T: git https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/misc/kernel.git >> +F: drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/inno-hdmi.c >> +F: include/drm/bridge/inno_hdmi.h >> + >> INOTIFY >> M: Jan Kara <[email protected]> >> R: Amir Goldstein <[email protected]> >> -- >> 2.43.0 > >I believe this patch should be squashed into the patch that actually >creates the files listed in the MAINTAINERS entry, like I do here [1]. >Checkpatch should be complaining about patch [1/2] if I'm not mistaken, >when you run `b4 prep --check`. We talked about something similar here[2]： Maxime believes they should be separate patches, And I've seen many merged commits in the kernel are also handle MAINTAINERS entry as separate patches [2]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rockchip/3ygqnj4idey7u4m7ltlv7pnfhkkvcepmpfdijdszctaeopq3ky@qteg33comjl3/ > >Link: >https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ > >[1] > >Kind regards, >Maud
