On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 07:04:43PM +0800, Junjie Cao wrote:
> Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]> 于2025年10月13日周一 17:39写道:
> > On 13/10/2025 04:52, 曹俊杰 wrote:
> > >  >Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>> 于2025年10月2日周四 10:04写道:
> > >  >On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 09:59:13PM +0800, Junjie Cao wrote:
> > >  >> From: Jun Nie <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >  >>
> > >  >> Some panels support multiple slice to be sent in a single DSC
> > > packet. And
> > >  >> this feature is a must for specific panels, such as JDI LPM026M648C.
> > > Add a
> > >  >> dsc_slice_per_pkt member into struct mipi_dsi_device and support the
> > >  >> feature in msm mdss driver.
> > >  >>
> > >  >> Co-developed-by: Jonathan Marek <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >  >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >  >> Signed-off-by: Jun Nie <[email protected] 
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >  >> Signed-off-by: Junjie Cao <[email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >  >> ---
> > >  >>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
> > >  >>  include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h         |  2 ++
> > >  >>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >  >
> > >  >Please extract the generic part, so that it can be merged through a
> > >  >generic tree.
> > >  >
> > >
> > > Sorry, I don't get it.  The generic part, generic tree? Do you mean
> > > the drm tree? `slice_per_pkt >= 2` is seen on the panels of these
> > > tablets that are equipped with qcom chips. I don't know if these
> > > panels are used on other platforms, and if it is necessary to do it
> > > in drm.
> >
> > There are two changes here:
> > - MIPI DSI header change
> > - msm DSI driver
> >
> > I've asked to split it to those two commits so that he change for
> > drm_mipi_dsi.h is more obvious for reviewers and so that it can be
> > merged through a drm-misc tree (or through drm-msm tree provided it gets
> > a necessary ack).
> >
> 
> Thanks for your clear explanation.
> 
> I don't mind to add the field separately. But should I submit it
> with the panel driver together? Otherwise, this field is unused
> for a while.
> 
> However, as you mentioned, this is not a part of standard, neither
> mipi dsi nor VESA DSC. Recently, only Qualcomm devices require it
> to calculate parameters, then we use them to program registers. Why
> don't we parse the field from devicetree?

Because the value is uniquelly identified by the panel's compat string.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to