On 10/9/25 1:28 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Thu Oct 9, 2025 at 8:16 PM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Thu Oct 9, 2025 at 8:59 AM CEST, Dirk Behme wrote:
>>> Assuming that register.rs is supposed to become the "generic" way to
>>> access hardware registers I started to have a look to it. Some weeks
>>> back testing interrupts I used some quite simple timer with 4 registers
>>> [1]. Now, thinking about converting it to register!() I have three
>>> understanding / usage questions:
>>>
>>> * At the moment register!() is for 32-bit registers, only? So it can't
>>> be used for my example having 8-bit and 16-bit registers as well?
>>
>> Yes, currently the register!() macro always generates a 32-bit register type
>> (mainly because nova-core did not need anything else). However, this will of
>> course be generalized (which should be pretty straight forward).
>>
>> Having a brief look at the TMU datasheet it looks like you should be able to
>> treat TSTR and TCR as 32-bit registers without any issues for testing the
>> register!() macro today. I.e. you can just define it as:
>>
>> register!(TSTR @ 0x04, "Timer Start Register" {
>> 2:2 str2 as bool, "Specifies whether TCNT2 is operated or
>> stopped.";
>> 1:1 str1 as bool, "Specifies whether TCNT1 is operated or
>> stopped.";
>> 0:0 str0 as bool, "Specifies whether TCNT0 is operated or
>> stopped.";
>> });
>>
>> Same for TCR.
>
> Patch 2 of this series actually adds support for 16 and 8 bit register
> storage.
Heh! I knew I saw a patch for this already somewhere, seems like I missed the
forest for the trees. :)
