чт, 9 жовт. 2025 р. о 00:14 Conor Dooley <[email protected]> пише: > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 10:30:33AM +0300, Svyatoslav Ryhel wrote: > > Document MIPI calibration device found in Tegra132. > > Could you explain why a fallback is not suitable? The patchset is really > too big for me to trivially check that the change is correct.
First of all, this compatible already exists in Linux kernel, I have just documented it to satisfy warnings. Secondly, each Tegra SoC generation has unique set of registers which should be configured. They all differ, hence fallback is not suitable here. > With an explanation, > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <[email protected]> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra114-mipi.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra114-mipi.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra114-mipi.yaml > > index 193ddb105283..9a500f52f01d 100644 > > --- > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra114-mipi.yaml > > +++ > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra114-mipi.yaml > > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: > > enum: > > - nvidia,tegra114-mipi > > - nvidia,tegra124-mipi > > + - nvidia,tegra132-mipi > > - nvidia,tegra210-mipi > > - nvidia,tegra186-mipi > > > > -- > > 2.48.1 > >
