On 10/20/2025 7:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2025 13:07, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2025 at 07:13:32PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/10/2025 03:53, Xiangxu Yin via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> From: Xiangxu Yin <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Describe the DisplayPort controller for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml     | 11 
>>>> +++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git 
>>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml 
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>>> index 
>>>> 9ac24f99d3ada1c197c9654dc9babebccae972ed..935eca23ce6b30b81b3ad778e5fcacc817a230c3
>>>>  100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>>> @@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ patternProperties:
>>>>        compatible:
>>>>          const: qcom,sm6150-dpu
>>>>  
>>>> +  "^displayport-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>>> +    type: object
>>>> +    additionalProperties: true
>>>> +    properties:
>>>> +      compatible:
>>>> +        items:
>>>> +          - const: qcom,sm6150-dp
>>>> +          - const: qcom,sm8150-dp
>>> 6150 is compatible with 8150 or 8350? I have doubts.
>> SM6150 has the same DP controller as SM8150. SM8150 is compatible with
>> SM8350.
>
> So if SM6150 is EXACTLY the same as SM8150, then describe it in commit
> msg. If NOT EXACTLY the same, then probably this should be just
> compatible with 8350. Anyway, proper justification is missing.
>
> Existing commit msg is pretty useless, repeat the diff. I can read the
> diff. Commit msg should explain all the background which is not obvious.


Yes, SM6150 uses the same DP controller as SM8150. We already discussed this in
'20250916-add-dp-controller-support-for-sm6150-v3-1-dd60ebbd1...@oss.qualcomm.com'.
I will update the commit message to clarify the compatible information and fix
the indentation in the binding example.


>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Reply via email to