On 10/21/25 8:53 PM, Joel Selvaraj via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Joel Selvaraj <[email protected]>
> 
> In Xiaomi Poco F1 and at least few other devices, the qcom wled driver
> triggers unbalanced ovp irq enable warning like the following during
> boot up.
> 
> [    1.151677] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [    1.151680] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 176
> [    1.151693] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 160 at kernel/irq/manage.c:774 
> __enable_irq+0x50/0x80
> [    1.151710] Modules linked in:
> [    1.151717] CPU: 0 PID: 160 Comm: kworker/0:11 Not tainted 5.17.0-sdm845 #4
> [    1.151724] Hardware name: Xiaomi Pocophone F1 (DT)
> [    1.151728] Workqueue: events wled_ovp_work
> ...<snip>...
> [    1.151833] Call trace:
> [    1.151836]  __enable_irq+0x50/0x80
> [    1.151841]  enable_irq+0x48/0xa0
> [    1.151846]  wled_ovp_work+0x18/0x24
> [    1.151850]  process_one_work+0x1d0/0x350
> [    1.151858]  worker_thread+0x13c/0x460
> [    1.151862]  kthread+0x110/0x114
> [    1.151868]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> [    1.151876] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fix it by storing and checking the state of ovp irq before enabling and
> disabling it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joel Selvaraj <[email protected]>
> ---
> I was able to debug the issue a little further. This happens mainly because
> devm_request_threaded_irq already enables the ovp irq during probe. Then ovp
> work gets scheduled when update_status happens and in turn enables the irq 
> again.
> Tracking the status makes it easy to avoid the double irq enable. But I am
> open to try a different approach if there is any suggestion.

Would reverting this change and adding (| IRQF_NO_AUTOEN) to that call
fix it?

Konrad

Reply via email to