Reviewed-by: Maciej Falkowski <[email protected]>
You didn't mentioned it is resend so I was a bit surprised the patch has
rev-by already from Jacek but I confirm it was given in the old thread.
Thanks,
Maciej
On 10/27/2025 2:39 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(),
pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call
to pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy().
Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <[email protected]>
---
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c | 1 -
drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
index ba4535a75aa7..4eb7287cd083 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_job.c
@@ -1114,6 +1114,5 @@ void ivpu_context_abort_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
mutex_unlock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock);
runtime_put:
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(vdev->drm.dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(vdev->drm.dev);
}
diff --git a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
index 63c95307faa1..fe6f93af6ab0 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/ivpu/ivpu_pm.c
@@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ int ivpu_rpm_get(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
void ivpu_rpm_put(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
{
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(vdev->drm.dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(vdev->drm.dev);
}
@@ -428,7 +427,6 @@ void ivpu_pm_enable(struct ivpu_device *vdev)
struct device *dev = vdev->drm.dev;
pm_runtime_allow(dev);
- pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
}