On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 5:16 PM Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Alexander, > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 03:52:28PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > > [Public] > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 9:15 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; Koenig, Christian > > > <[email protected]>; David Airlie <[email protected]>; Simona > > > Vetter > > > <[email protected]>; Kuehling, Felix <[email protected]>; Feng, Kenneth > > > <[email protected]>; Lyude Paul <[email protected]>; Danilo Krummrich > > > <[email protected]>; Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>; > > > Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>; Thomas Zimmermann > > > <[email protected]>; Limonciello, Mario <[email protected]>; > > > Hung, Alex <[email protected]>; Antonio Quartulli <[email protected]>; > > > Nirujogi, Pratap <[email protected]>; Lazar, Lijo > > > <[email protected]>; > > > Dmitry Baryshkov <[email protected]>; SHANMUGAM, SRINIVASAN > > > <[email protected]>; Wang, Yang(Kevin) > > > <[email protected]>; Khatri, Sunil <[email protected]>; Zhang, > > > Jesse(Jie) <[email protected]>; Ville Syrjälä > > > <[email protected]>; > > > Liviu Dudau <[email protected]>; Laurent Pinchart > > > <[email protected]>; Zhang, Hawking > > > <[email protected]>; Prosyak, Vitaly <[email protected]>; Arnd > > > Bergmann <[email protected]>; Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>; Ingo > > > Molnar > > > <[email protected]>; Liao Yuanhong <[email protected]>; Rodrigo > > > Siqueira > > > <[email protected]>; Liang, Prike <[email protected]>; Sharma, > > > Shashank > > > <[email protected]>; Paneer Selvam, Arunpravin > > > <[email protected]>; Zhou1, Tao <[email protected]>; > > > Chai, Thomas <[email protected]>; Xie, Patrick <[email protected]>; > > > Liu, Xiang(Dean) <[email protected]>; Skvortsov, Victor > > > <[email protected]>; Sun, Ce(Overlord) <[email protected]>; Dave > > > Airlie <[email protected]>; Jani Nikula <[email protected]>; Gustavo > > > A. R. > > > Silva <[email protected]>; Imre Deak <[email protected]>; Ben Skeggs > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; amd- > > > [email protected] > > > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] drm/amd: Remove redundant pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() > > > calls > > > > > > pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend(), > > > pm_runtime_autosuspend() and pm_request_autosuspend() now include a call > > > to > > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). Remove the now-reduntant explicit call to > > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(). > > > > > > Typo: should be "now-redundant" > > Oops. You're first one to notice, in fact. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]> > > > > Patches 1, 3 are: > > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> > > > > When did mark_last_busy get pulled into the other runtime_pm functions? > > Did you want me to pick these up or did you want to send them via some > > other tree? > > Yes, please merge these.
Applied. Thanks! Alex > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() has been part of autosuspend related functions > since commit 18c1fe53d186867243f4cf17f4eef60737a16c4c, i.e. v6.17. > > -- > Kind regards, > > Sakari Ailus
