Hi Ahmad, On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:53 PM Liu Ying <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/20/2025, Fabio Estevam wrote: > > Hi Liu, > > Hi Fabio, > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 1:12 AM Liu Ying <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Strictly speaking, I don't think i.MX6SX LCDIF is compatible with i.MX28 > >> LCDIF > >> because at least i.MX28 LCDIF has the version and debug{0,1,2} registers(at > >> 0x1c0, 0x1d0, 0x1e0 and 0x1f0) while i.MX6SX LCDIF hasn't. > > > > There are some DT users, such as Barebox that matches against > > fsl,imx28-lcdif, so we cannot remove it. > > Hmmm, it looks like software projects like Barebox don't really follow this DT > binding. Is it possible to fix Barebox to avoid changing this DT binding by > this patch? I'm assuming that Uboot has already been fixed.
What do you think? Thanks
