On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:51:07AM +0000, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:47:18AM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote: > > Currently when calling pwm_apply_might_sleep in the probe routine > > the pwm will be configured with an not fully defined state. > > > > The duty_cycle is not yet set in that moment. There is a final > > backlight_update_status call that will have a properly setup state. > > However this change in the backlight can create a short flicker if the > > backlight was already preinitialised. > > > > We fix the flicker by moving the pwm_apply after the default duty_cycle > > can be calculated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <[email protected]> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson (RISCstar) <[email protected]>
I guess this tag resulted in Lee picking up the change. I wonder if you share my concern and who's responsibility it is now to address it. Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
