在 2025-11-24星期一的 13:31 +0100，Krzysztof Kozlowski写道： > On 24/11/2025 13:20, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 01:08:00PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > wrote: > > > On 24/11/2025 13:05, Conor Dooley wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't really get what the fuss is with the dual signoff, > > > > what's the > > > > point having both when they represent the same person? Pretty > > > > sure it > > > > was you (Krzysztof) and Arnd that told me not to both doing the > > > > double > > > > signoff. > > > > > > I do not object having or not having dual signed off HERE. > > > > > > I never said that. Just like I never said "From" has to be > > > changed. > > > > I didn't say you objected to both being there. *I* am saying that > > it is > > Ah, sure. Yes, if both identities work I would propose to skip second > SoB. But I also stopped objecting of having two identities listed, as > long as they are correct.
Well it's unfortunate that some policy now requires me to list the second identity. Should I resend the whole patchset with the ISCAS mail? (The problem with it is that it forces application-specific password, and with git-send-email lacking a proper key store, this makes the password a one-time one.) > > > probably not worth doing. That's especially the case when it is > > adding > > complication about correct ordering of signoffs and maybe > > interacting with > > how git-send-email decides to insert From: fields. > > > > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
