Hi, On 25/11/2025 18:13, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 3:08 PM Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> This fixes two regressions experienced in the MCDE and >> R-Car DU DRM drivers after >> commit c9b1150a68d9362a0827609fc0dc1664c0d8bfe1 >> "drm/atomic-helper: Re-order bridge chain pre-enable and post-disable" >> caused a series of regressions in all panels that send >> DSI commands in their .prepare() and .unprepare() >> callbacks. >> >> This series make it possible to selectively bring back the >> old behaviour with explicit semantics and implements >> the old behaviour as modified commit tails in MCDE and >> R-Car DU. > > So what's the take on this patch series? > > Maxime: is this what you had in mind? Acked-by? > > Marek: do you think you have an opportunity to test this on the R-Car DU? > > I am happy to develop a fifth version using the approach outlined by > Tomi (special codepaths in the helpers) if there is some consensus > that this is better in the long run. I'm ok with this, it looks quite clean solution to a messy problem. My only comment was about the missing kernel docs.
Tomi
