On 26/11/2025 12:14, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:51:34 +0100
> Boris Brezillon <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> This series is a collection of fixes that seem to address the problem
>> reported here [1]. In order to validate those changes, I added a few
>> IGT tests [2], but I'd like to extend the test coverage before claiming
>> this is working properly. Until I get to it, I thought I'd post what
>> I have for preliminary review/testing.
> 
> I've posted the IGT patches to make sure the bugs fixed here are caught
> if it ever regresses again. If there's no objection, I'd like to merge
> those patches before the end of the week (given we're passed the 6.19
> branching point, this should give us plenty of time to address
> regressions, if any).

I believe you've already got my R-b on all the patches, so from my point
of view: merge away! ;)

Thanks,
Steve

>>
>> No major changes in this version, for more details, check the changelog
>> in each patch.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Boris
>>
>> [1]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/issues/48
>> [2]https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bbrezillon/igt-gpu-tools/-/tree/panthor-sched?ref_type=heads
>>
>> Boris Brezillon (8):
>>   drm/panthor: Simplify group idleness tracking
>>   drm/panthor: Don't try to enable extract events
>>   drm/panthor: Fix the group priority rotation logic
>>   drm/panthor: Fix the full_tick check
>>   drm/panthor: Fix immediate ticking on a disabled tick
>>   drm/panthor: Fix the logic that decides when to stop ticking
>>   drm/panthor: Make sure we resume the tick when new jobs are submitted
>>   drm/panthor: Kill panthor_sched_immediate_tick()
>>
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_sched.c | 190 ++++++++++++------------
>>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>>
> 

Reply via email to