>-----Original Message-----
>From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Ruhl,
>Michael J
>Sent: Friday, December 5, 2025 11:02 AM
>To: Christian König <[email protected]>; Auld, Matthew
><[email protected]>; [email protected]; dri-
>[email protected]; [email protected];
>[email protected]
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: improve sg_table debugging hack v3
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: dri-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
>>Christian König
>>Sent: Friday, December 5, 2025 8:06 AM
>>To: Auld, Matthew <[email protected]>; [email protected];
>>[email protected]; [email protected];
>>[email protected]; Ruhl, Michael J <[email protected]>
>>Subject: [PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: improve sg_table debugging hack v3
>>
>>This debugging hack is important to enforce the rule that importers
>>should *never* touch the underlying struct page of the exporter.
>>
>>Instead of just mangling the page link create a copy of the sg_table
>>but only copy over the DMA addresses and not the pages.
>>
>>This will cause a NULL pointer de-reference if the importer tries to
>>touch the struct page. Still quite a hack but this at least allows the
>>exporter to properly keeps it's sg_table intact while allowing the
>>DMA-buf maintainer to find and fix misbehaving importers and finally
>>switch over to using a different data structure in the future.
>>
>>v2: improve the hack further by using a wrapper structure and explaining
>>the background a bit more in the commit message.
>>v3: fix some whitespace issues, use sg_assign_page().
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
>>Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <[email protected]> (v1)
>>---
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>--
>>---
>> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>index 2305bb2cc1f1..944f4103b5cc 100644
>>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
>>@@ -35,6 +35,12 @@
>>
>> #include "dma-buf-sysfs-stats.h"
>>
>>+/* Wrapper to hide the sg_table page link from the importer */
>>+struct dma_buf_sg_table_wrapper {
>>+     struct sg_table *original;
>>+     struct sg_table wrapper;
>>+};
>>+
>> static inline int is_dma_buf_file(struct file *);
>>
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(dmabuf_list_mutex);
>>@@ -828,21 +834,59 @@ void dma_buf_put(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_put, "DMA_BUF");
>>
>>-static void mangle_sg_table(struct sg_table *sg_table)
>>+static int dma_buf_mangle_sg_table(struct sg_table **sg_table)
>
>you are not really mangling this anymore...
>
>dma_buf_clone_sg_table()
>dma_buf_unclone_sg_table()
>
>maybe?
>
>
>> {
>>-#ifdef CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG
>>-     int i;
>>-     struct scatterlist *sg;
>>-
>>-     /* To catch abuse of the underlying struct page by importers mix
>>-      * up the bits, but take care to preserve the low SG_ bits to
>>-      * not corrupt the sgt. The mixing is undone on unmap
>>-      * before passing the sgt back to the exporter.
>>+     struct scatterlist *to_sg, *from_sg;
>>+     struct sg_table *from = *sg_table;
>>+     struct dma_buf_sg_table_wrapper *to;
>>+     int i, ret;
>>+
>>+     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG))
>>+             return 0;
>>+
>>+     /*
>>+      * To catch abuse of the underlying struct page by importers copy the
>>+      * sg_table without copying the page_link and give only the copy back
>>to
>>+      * the importer.
>>       */
>>-     for_each_sgtable_sg(sg_table, sg, i)
>>-             sg->page_link ^= ~0xffUL;
>>-#endif
>>+     to = kzalloc(sizeof(*to), GFP_KERNEL);
>>+     if (!to)
>>+             return -ENOMEM;
>>+
>>+     ret = sg_alloc_table(&to->wrapper, from->nents, GFP_KERNEL);
>>+     if (ret)
>>+             goto free_to;
>>+
>>+     to_sg = to->wrapper.sgl;
>>+     for_each_sgtable_dma_sg(from, from_sg, i) {
>>+             to_sg->offset = 0;
>>+             to_sg->length = 0;
>>+             sg_assign_page(to_sg, NULL);
>
>sg_set_page(to_sg, NULL, 0, 0); ?

Just why you are using this one... ignore this thought...

>Just thoughts... This looks reasonable to me.
>
>With or without these changes:
>
>Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <[email protected]>
>
>M
>
>>+             sg_dma_address(to_sg) = sg_dma_address(from_sg);
>>+             sg_dma_len(to_sg) = sg_dma_len(from_sg);
>>+             to_sg = sg_next(to_sg);
>>+     }
>>
>>+     to->original = from;
>>+     *sg_table = &to->wrapper;
>>+     return 0;
>>+
>>+free_to:
>>+     kfree(to);
>>+     return ret;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static void dma_buf_demangle_sg_table(struct sg_table **sg_table)
>>+{
>>+     struct dma_buf_sg_table_wrapper *copy;
>>+
>>+     if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMABUF_DEBUG))
>>+             return;
>>+
>>+     copy = container_of(*sg_table, typeof(*copy), wrapper);
>>+     *sg_table = copy->original;
>>+     sg_free_table(&copy->wrapper);
>>+     kfree(copy);
>> }
>>
>> static inline bool
>>@@ -1139,7 +1183,9 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct
>>dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>              if (ret < 0)
>>                      goto error_unmap;
>>      }
>>-     mangle_sg_table(sg_table);
>>+     ret = dma_buf_mangle_sg_table(&sg_table);
>>+     if (ret)
>>+             goto error_unmap;
>>
>>      if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG)) {
>>              struct scatterlist *sg;
>>@@ -1220,7 +1266,7 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct
>>dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>>
>>      dma_resv_assert_held(attach->dmabuf->resv);
>>
>>-     mangle_sg_table(sg_table);
>>+     dma_buf_demangle_sg_table(&sg_table);
>>      attach->dmabuf->ops->unmap_dma_buf(attach, sg_table, direction);
>>
>>      if (dma_buf_pin_on_map(attach))
>>--
>>2.43.0

Reply via email to