On Wed, Dec 10, 2025, at 05:54, Brigham Campbell wrote:
> On Thu Dec 4, 2025 at 2:45 AM MST, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> Change this to a pointer as was liley intended here.
>
> Shoot, you're absolutely right that I didn't mean to create a copy of
> the struct on the stack when I wrote that code. Thanks for the fix! I'll
> try to be more careful with struct usage and the stack in the future.
>
> Can I ask how you got the build process to emit those warnings? I didn't
> see it when I developed my patch.
I'm doing randconfig tests to check a large number of possible configurations.
I also have the CONFIG_FRAME_WARN logic replaced with lower configuration
specific default to catch more regressions in this particular area.
Arnd
