Hello, On Fri Nov 28, 2025 at 11:07 AM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> +Cc Emanuele, Francesco, João >> >> On Thu Nov 27, 2025 at 7:35 PM CET, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:34:33 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: >> >> This is a first attempt at gracefully handling the case of atomic updates >> >> happening concurrently to physical removal of DRM bridges. >> >> >> >> This is part of the work to support hotplug of DRM bridges. The grand plan >> >> was discussed in [1]. >> >> >> >> [ ... ] >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> Two alternative patches [0][1] have been sent to address the issue with >> PLL_UNLOCK, and both would conflict with patch 2 of this series. So I'd >> keep this series on hold for a while, waiting for a decision to be taken >> about how the PLL_UNLOCK issue will be handled. I'll then rebase this >> series as needed. > > Yep, agreed.
Turns out the patch that got applied does not conflict with this series, out of luck with the code layout. So I'm applying this one today. Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
