Hi, On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 05:50:11PM +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > of_drm_find_bridge() does not increment the refcount for the returned > bridge, but that is required now. However converting it and all its users > is not realistically doable at once given the large amount of (direct and > indirect) callers and the complexity of some. > > Solve this issue by creating a new of_drm_get_bridge() function that is > identical to of_drm_find_bridge() except it takes a reference. Then > of_drm_find_bridge() will be deprecated to be eventually removed. > > Suggested-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> > Link: > https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20250319-stylish-lime-mongoose-0a18ad@houat/ > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
I don't think it's a good name still. It's way too close to drm_bridge_get it gets confusing. I still believe that of_drm_find_and_get_bridge() is a better name. If you disagree, please explain why. Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
