Thanks for the review.
You’re right — I should be using adev_to_drm() instead of accessing adev->ddev directly. I’ll rework the patch to: - use adev_to_drm(adev) for drm_* logging - drop any unrelated changes I’ll send a v2 shortly.
Thanks for the review.
You’re right — I should be using adev_to_drm() instead of accessing adev->ddev directly. I’ll rework the patch to: - use adev_to_drm(adev) for drm_* logging - drop any unrelated changes I’ll send a v2 shortly.