This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with
the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in:

   commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
   commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")

The refactoring is going to alter the default behavior of
alloc_workqueue() to be unbound by default.

With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU. For more details see the Link tag below.

This specific workload has no benefit being per-cpu, so its behavior has
been changed using explicitly WQ_UNBOUND.

Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
index a085faac9fe1..5ecdb338b390 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -690,7 +690,8 @@ void kfd_procfs_del_queue(struct queue *q)
 int kfd_process_create_wq(void)
 {
        if (!kfd_process_wq)
-               kfd_process_wq = alloc_workqueue("kfd_process_wq", 0, 0);
+               kfd_process_wq = alloc_workqueue("kfd_process_wq", WQ_UNBOUND,
+                                                0);
        if (!kfd_restore_wq)
                kfd_restore_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("kfd_restore_wq",
                                                         WQ_FREEZABLE);
-- 
2.52.0

Reply via email to