On 1/2/26 18:25, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
On 02/01/2026 at 18:18, David Heidelberg wrote:
On 02/01/2026 18:13, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
On 02/01/2026 at 17:34, David Heidelberg wrote:
On 30/12/2025 23:20, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
The kernel has no actual grey-scale logos. And looking at the git
history, it seems that there never was one (or maybe there was in the
pre-git history? I did not check that far…)

Remove the Makefile rule for the .pgm grey scale images.

Great to see this series.

Thanks!

I think the Fixes: tag should still go here, even if it is not very
specific.

But then, what do I put in the fixes tag? This:

    Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")

?

Yes


I am not sure it is worth bothering the stable team for something that
isn't causing any real harm.

That was my original thinking as well, but the Fixes tag is not only
about stable backports. It is also used for tracking, tooling, and
documentation, so stable picking up such patches is just one of its
purposes.

OK. Then why not. I added the tag in my local tree, but I will wait a
couple days for the other review comments before sending. I will not
spam everyone with a v3 just for that.

I like your patch!
So, I've added the v2 series to the fbdev git tree.

I don't think a "Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")" tag is
appropriate, since it doesn't fixes anything.

Let's see if issues arise due to the wider testing...

Helge

Reply via email to