On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 06:57:32PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> On 1/24/26 17:46, Osama Abdelkader wrote:
> > fb_pad_unaligned_buffer() unconditionally reads and advances the source
> > pointer for the final byte of each row, even when no bits from that byte
> > are actually consumed.
> > 
> > When shift_high >= mod, the remaining bits do not cross a byte boundary,
> > but the code still accesses the next source byte. This can lead to
> > out-of-bounds reads under malformed geometry, as reported by syzbot.
> > 
> > Fix this by only accessing and consuming the final source byte when it
> > contributes bits (shift_high < mod).
> > 
> > This fixes the KASAN slab-out-of-bounds read reported by syzkaller:
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=55e03490a0175b8dd81d
> > 
> > Reported-by: [email protected]
> > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=55e03490a0175b8dd81d
> > Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2: address the real issue (shift_high >= mod) condition.
> > ---
> >   drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 15 +++++++++------
> >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c 
> > b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > index eff757ebbed1..d125c3db37a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fb_pad_aligned_buffer);
> >   void fb_pad_unaligned_buffer(u8 *dst, u32 d_pitch, u8 *src, u32 idx, u32 
> > height,
> >                             u32 shift_high, u32 shift_low, u32 mod)
> >   {
> > -   u8 mask = (u8) (0xfff << shift_high), tmp;
> > +   u8 mask = (u8) (0xff << shift_high), tmp;
> 
> This part is correct, but shouldn't be part of this patch.

I just sent a seperate patch for that, and going to remove it in next version 
of this one.

> 
> 
> >     int i, j;
> >     for (i = height; i--; ) {
> > @@ -113,15 +113,18 @@ void fb_pad_unaligned_buffer(u8 *dst, u32 d_pitch, u8 
> > *src, u32 idx, u32 height,
> >                     dst[j+1] = tmp;
> >                     src++;
> >             }
> > -           tmp = dst[idx];
> > -           tmp &= mask;
> > -           tmp |= *src >> shift_low;
> > -           dst[idx] = tmp;
> > +
> > +           /* Only consume another source byte if it contributes bits */
> >             if (shift_high < mod) {
> > +                   tmp = dst[idx];
> > +                   tmp &= mask;
> > +                   tmp |= *src >> shift_low;
> > +                   dst[idx] = tmp;
> >                     tmp = *src << shift_high;
> >                     dst[idx+1] = tmp;
> > +                   src++;
> >             }
> > -           src++;
> 
> Above you moved the src pointer inside the if(), so every line
> processed may miss a ptr increment. This means the source would need to
> be different too, but it hasn't changed, as it's still used from
> bit_putcs_unaligned() which prints a char from the character fonts.
> 
> So, I believe this part at least is wrong.
> Did you test it?
> 

I couldn't find syzbot's ReproC, so I did minimal one, I will re-test it and 
write you.
 
> Helge

BR,
Osama

Reply via email to