On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > On 1/29/26 1:13 AM, Sibi Sankar wrote: > > Enable ADSP and CDSP on Glymur CRD board. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <[email protected]> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts > > index 0899214465ac..0eed4faa8b07 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts > > @@ -487,6 +487,20 @@ &pon_resin { > > status = "okay"; > > }; > > > > +&remoteproc_adsp { > > + firmware-name = "qcom/glymur/adsp.mbn", > > + "qcom/glymur/adsp_dtb.mbn"; > > + > > + status = "okay"; > > +}; > > + > > +&remoteproc_cdsp { > > + firmware-name = "qcom/glymur/cdsp.mbn", > > + "qcom/glymur/cdsp_dtb.mbn"; > > + > > + status = "okay"; > > +}; > > Please make sure it gets to L-F (only Kaanapali is there right now) > > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <[email protected]>
Hmm, looking at x1e80100-crd which references qcom/x1e80100/adsp.mbn, but the firmware in linux-firmware is (now) targeting IoT devices, should we use WoA-like names for firmware on Glymur CRD instead (qcadsp-something.mbn). It would match what was done for the SC8280XP CRD. -- With best wishes Dmitry
