Hello Marek,
On Tue Jan 13, 2026 at 12:47 AM CET, Marek Vasut wrote:
> In order to avoid any probe ordering issue, the best practice is to move
> the secondary MIPI-DSI device registration and attachment to the
> MIPI-DSI host at probe time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
Hadn't seen this patch initially, but it caught my attention now.
> Note that this is similar to e.g. commit
> 6ef7ee48765f ("drm/bridge: sn65dsi83: Register and attach our DSI device at
> probe")
> and pretty much what every other DSI-to-DPI bridge does.
Digression:
Looking at 6ef7ee48765f, I now realize it has removed one obstacle to the
DRM bridge hotplug which I'm working to achieve. For the interested,
there would be one more issue in addition to those I discussed in [0]
without that commit.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Back to your patch, I don't have the hardware but LGTM and I'm not aware of
any issues it might cause. Still it would be good if you could describe
what goes wrong with current code.
Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <[email protected]>
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
