On 2/5/2026 9:23 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:05:31PM +0800, Joey Lu wrote:
  &uart0 {
@@ -129,3 +165,23 @@ &uart16 {
        pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uart16>;
        status = "okay";
  };
+
+&panel {
+       port {
+               panel_in: endpoint@0 {
+                       remote-endpoint = <&dpi_out>;
+               };
+       };
+};
+
+&display {
What sort of ordering rule is followed in Nuvoton? Why is it different
than DTS coding style? Why do you choose other style?

+       pinctrl-names = "default";
+       pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_display>;
+       status = "okay";
+
+       port {
+               dpi_out: endpoint@0 {
+                       remote-endpoint = <&panel_in>;
+               };
+       };
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/ma35d1.dtsi 
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/ma35d1.dtsi
index e51b98f5bdce..7d9d077f12b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/ma35d1.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nuvoton/ma35d1.dtsi
@@ -379,5 +379,19 @@ uart16: serial@40880000 {
                        clocks = <&clk UART16_GATE>;
                        status = "disabled";
                };
+
+               panel: panel {
No, there is no way your SoC has a panel.

Don't add fake stuff to your DTS.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

I'll move panel nodes out of dtsi into board dts.

Joey

Reply via email to