On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 03:02:09PM +0100, Alice Ryhl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 2:38 PM Maxime Ripard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If Daniel's proposal is inconvenient for some drivers, it would be far > > > better to have a third API that is both safe and convenient for those > > > drivers. > > > > Yeah, I guess I was expecting that one to come after we have a few > > unsafe drivers using it and we do need to consolidate / make it safe. > > For most things, we implemented and used the safe API from the very > start. I'm not going to say there are never exceptions to that because > there *are* exceptions. But I don't really see why clk should be one > of them.
Ack. As long as we keep the door open for such an API, I'm ok with it then. Maxime
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
