On 15/02/2026 11:01, Onur Özkan wrote: > Hi all, > > This series follows the discussion around panthor's SRAM regulator handling > and the DT expectations for mali GPU nodes. > > Today, if sram-supply is missing in the DT file, panthor falls back to > a dummy regulator with a warning. This implicit behavior hides missing > DT wiring behind regulator core fallback. > > As discussed in [1], the agreed direction is: > - Update DTs to explicitly provide sram-supply, when no separate SRAM > rail exists, use the same regulator as mali-supply. > - Make panthor to treat sram-supply as mandatory for all compatibles > except mt8196-mali (as that SoC manages SRAM outside panthor). >
Your threading is messed/broken. Start using b4 or just use git format-patch in a standard way (so one command and then one command for sending). Best regards, Krzysztof
