On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 08:45:29AM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On 2/26/26 20:20, Conor Dooley wrote:
> [..]
> >> + - |
> >> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> >> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> >> +
> >> + bus {
> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >> +
> >> + neutron@4ab00000 {
> > "neutron" is not a generic node name. This should be something like
> > "accelerator" or similar.
> >
> The only dts nodes I could find using accel subsystem are from rockhip. And
> they use npu@
>
> e.g:
>
> » rknn_core_0: npu@fdab0000 {
> » » compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-rknn-core";
>
> Also, Ethos-U64 introduced by Rob with [1] is using npu@.
>
> So, I think we should go wit that. I haven't seen any document to standardize
> the naming.accelerator, npu, makes no difference to me, so sure.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
