On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 03:11:58PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > On 3/23/26 15:10, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2026 at 08:56:58AM +0100, Raag Jadav wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 06:36:46PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > >>> Currently 'none' recovery method for wedged event expects no explicit > >>> recovery from userspace consumer but it expects driver to have reset > >>> the device, which may not always be the case. Update documentation and > >>> log to reflect this expectation. > >> > >> Anything I can do to move this forward? > > Invent some tech to clone certain people so that we have more reviewers.
If this allows my clones to also review my patches, I fully support this :) > > Ping. > > I will take a look now. Thank you, I think it's safe to land through drm-misc (if anyone has access). Raag > >>> v2: Rephrase documentation (Rodrigo) > >>> > >>> Raag Jadav (3): > >>> drm/doc: Update documentation for 'none' recovery method > >>> drm: Update log for 'none' recovery method > >>> drm/xe: Send 'none' recovery method for > >>> XE_WEDGED_MODE_UPON_ANY_HANG_NO_RESET > >>> > >>> Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 14 +++++++------- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 2 +- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 9 ++++++++- > >>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> -- > >>> 2.43.0 > >>> >
