On Thu, Mar 26, 2026 8:29 PM Chen Ni wrote:
> Using a ',' in place of a ';' can have unintended side effects.
> Although that is not the case here, it seems best to use ';'
> unless ',' is intended.
> 
> Found by inspection.
> No functional change intended.
> Compile tested only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <[email protected]>

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Shuicheng Lin <[email protected]>

BTW, it is blocked by the CI due to the mail address restriction. Let me 
re-send it for CI validation.
Thanks. 

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c index
> d96e0a0c5605..21844217dccd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -626,9 +626,9 @@ void xe_vm_add_fault_entry_pf(struct xe_vm *vm,
> struct xe_pagefault *pf)
>       e->address_precision = SZ_4K;
>       e->access_type = pf->consumer.access_type;
>       e->fault_type = FIELD_GET(XE_PAGEFAULT_TYPE_MASK,
> -                               pf->consumer.fault_type_level),
> +                               pf->consumer.fault_type_level);
>       e->fault_level = FIELD_GET(XE_PAGEFAULT_LEVEL_MASK,
> -                                pf->consumer.fault_type_level),
> +                                pf->consumer.fault_type_level);
> 
>       list_add_tail(&e->list, &vm->faults.list);
>       vm->faults.len++;
> --
> 2.25.1

Reply via email to