On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 11:16:21AM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 10:25:40PM +0800, Jonathan Cavitt wrote:
> > Remove the "if (ret < 0)" branch after idr_replace in
> > drm_gem_change_handle_ioctl.  It is unused, as in the only place we
> > modify the return value between there and the previous return value
> > check, we also immediately jump to out_unlock, bypassing the check
> > entirely.
> > 
> > Issue caught by static analysis.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>

It doesn't apply in drm-misc branches yet because it doesn't yet
have the culprit patch that caused this code.

That is only part of drm-fixes:

5e28b7b94408 ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in change_handle")

I believe this patch here can wait this culprit patch to get propagated
through a backmerge/rebase...

> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]>
> > Cc: David Airlie <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Simona Vetter <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> > index abc8e41d6652..110bc5a58862 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> > @@ -1067,9 +1067,6 @@ int drm_gem_change_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device 
> > *dev, void *data,
> >  
> >     spin_unlock(&file_priv->table_lock);
> >  
> > -   if (ret < 0)
> > -           goto out_unlock;
> > -
> >     if (obj->dma_buf) {
> >             ret = drm_prime_add_buf_handle(&file_priv->prime, obj->dma_buf,
> >                                            handle);
> > -- 
> > 2.53.0
> > 

Reply via email to