On 23/05/2026 14:12, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

8><

I will respin next week or so. Or if you tell me the global lock can be
easily dropped from .run_job I can drop and forget about it. Wider
context is that I am experimenting with kthread_worker conversion and
trying to polish a
somewhat-broken-but-showing-great-latency-improvements branch.

Yep, I know, your experimental branch is actually on my list of things
to look at/test ;-).

Hold off a few days at least, there is a UAF in the branch Chia-I tested and I am in the process of reworking some details to eliminate that.

FYI the new branch is at:

https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~tursulin/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-sched-kworker-single-submit

And benchmark numbers from Chia-I are at:

https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/panfrost/linux/-/work_items/49#note_3484837

Those were collected from the old branch, but I am quite confident the fixed version will behave the same.

In summary it is quite compelling, and details aside, I guess the question at some point will be where do we go from here. Do we proceed in building something on top of kthread_worker, if the problem of spawning too many threads cannot be otherwise avoided, do we go back to the workqueue maintainers asking to re-consider adding priority inheritance or something, or some third option.

Regards,

Tvrtko

Reply via email to