On Tue Jun 2, 2026 at 4:17 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote: > Danilo, we previously discussed merging this series with I/O projection for > patch logistics. However, I'll need more time for next version of I/O > projection (implementing view types that have original container type > erased) which won't make it this cycle. This new version for projection > syntax rework is minor changes only comparde to v1, so I think it's worth > sending out so it can still land this cycle and get out of the way.
[...] > base-commit: 46def663dd34da36464ba059f7cfeacf29d98e5e Agreed, as discussed; and in this case I think this can go through rust-next. Acked-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]>
