Overall, it doesn't address any compiler warnings, but this is my first
patch. I wanted to start with something concrete, and I saw an unsafe
function and tried to fix it. The fact that the compilation behavior won't
change is true, but the code will become a bit more formal — maybe that's a
good thing.

пн, 1 июн. 2026 г. в 11:25, Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>:

> On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 3:44 AM Enchanted Hunter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This patch replaces unsafe sprintf calls with snprintf in
> > fbtft_register_framebuffer() to prevent potential buffer overflow.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: rat1bor <[email protected]>
>
> Does this change address any compiler warning or something like that?
> At a glance I do not see any usefulness of this patch except an
> unneeded churn.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>

Reply via email to