Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider: - [Low] The vendor prefix 'ayntec' is used in compatible strings but is not documented in vendor-prefixes.yaml, which will cause dt_binding_check to fail. --
commit 5d6611d7262ab82a8a3721761623b1f394d6e2ec Author: Aaron Kling <[email protected]> dt-bindings: display: panel: Add Chipone ICNA3512 OLED driver bindings This commit adds device tree bindings for the Chipone ICNA3512 and ICNA3520 MIPI-DSI OLED panel drivers. > diff --git > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000000000..90e69f30cd91c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/chipone,icna3512.yaml [ ... ] > +properties: > + compatible: > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - enum: > + - ayaneo,pocketds-panel-top > + - ayntec,odin2portal-panel [Severity: Low] Does this new vendor prefix need to be added to vendor-prefixes.yaml? Device tree schema validation verifies all compatible strings against the known list of vendor prefixes. Since 'ayntec' isn't currently documented there, will this cause dt_binding_check to report errors when validating this schema? [ ... ] -- Sashiko AI review ยท https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
