On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 02:25:06PM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 01:13:12PM +0200, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > On 5/23/2026 7:00 AM, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > Hardware errors should be logged with HW_ERR prefix. Make them
> > > consistent with existing logs.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 01aab7e1c9d4 ("drm/xe/xe_hw_error: Add support for PVC SoC errors")
> > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c | 12 ++++++------
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c 
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > index 5135e8e4093f..4b72959b2276 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_hw_error.c
> > > @@ -223,9 +223,9 @@ static void log_hw_error(struct xe_tile *tile, const 
> > > char *name,
> > >   struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> > >  
> > >   if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERR_SEV_CORRECTABLE)
> > > -         drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s %s detected\n", name, severity_str);
> > > +         drm_warn(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s %s detected\n", name, 
> > > severity_str);
> > 
> > function is per-tile, so shouldn't we use tile-oriented logs instead?
> 
> Agree, but then it needs to be done file-wide which I'll pursue once
> the fix lands and propageted.

Even better, there's a driver-wide refactor[1] incoming.

Raag

[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/168333/

> >             xe_tile_warn(tile, HW_ERR ...)
> > 
> > >   else
> > > -         drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, "%s %s detected\n", name, 
> > > severity_str);
> > > +         drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s %s detected\n", name, 
> > > severity_str);
> > 
> >             xe_tile_err_ratelimited(tile, HW_ERR ...)
> > 
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void log_gt_err(struct xe_tile *tile, const char *name, int i, 
> > > u32 err,
> > > @@ -235,10 +235,10 @@ static void log_gt_err(struct xe_tile *tile, const 
> > > char *name, int i, u32 err,
> > >   struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> > >  
> > >   if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERR_SEV_CORRECTABLE)
> > > -         drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s %s detected, 
> > > ERROR_STAT_GT_VECTOR%d:0x%08x\n",
> > > +         drm_warn(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s %s detected, 
> > > ERROR_STAT_GT_VECTOR%d:0x%08x\n",
> > >                    name, severity_str, i, err);
> > >   else
> > > -         drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, "%s %s detected, 
> > > ERROR_STAT_GT_VECTOR%d:0x%08x\n",
> > > +         drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s %s detected, 
> > > ERROR_STAT_GT_VECTOR%d:0x%08x\n",
> > >                               name, severity_str, i, err);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > @@ -255,9 +255,9 @@ static void log_soc_error(struct xe_tile *tile, const 
> > > char * const *reg_info,
> > >  
> > >   if (strcmp(name, "Undefined")) {
> > >           if (severity == DRM_XE_RAS_ERR_SEV_CORRECTABLE)
> > > -                 drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s detected", name, 
> > > severity_str);
> > > +                 drm_warn(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s SOC %s detected", name, 
> > > severity_str);
> > >           else
> > > -                 drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, "%s SOC %s detected", 
> > > name, severity_str);
> > > +                 drm_err_ratelimited(&xe->drm, HW_ERR "%s SOC %s 
> > > detected", name, severity_str);
> > >           atomic_inc(&info[index].counter);
> > >   }
> > >  }
> > 

Reply via email to