Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) 
to consider:
- [Low] Incorrect use of `#[inline(always)]` on `__call_ioctl` without 
`build_assert!()`.
--

commit 681c752cb3d2e7c1fa7dd279a52a3695aceaee3b
Author: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]>

rust: drm: restrict AlwaysRefCounted to Normal Device context

This commit restricts the AlwaysRefCounted implementation for drm::Device to
the Normal context. It clarifies that registered devices represent non-owning
views and must not be independently reference-counted. The commit also
refactors DRM IOCTL handling to use a lifetime-bounded closure approach.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs b/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> index cf328101dde4e..023e6da5c1e4b 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/drm/ioctl.rs
> @@ -70,6 +70,39 @@ pub mod internal {
>      pub use bindings::drm_device;
>      pub use bindings::drm_file;
>      pub use bindings::drm_ioctl_desc;
> +
> +    /// Call an ioctl handler with lifetime-bounded references.
> +    ///
> +    /// The lifetime `'a` is tied to the `_anchor` parameter. This prevents 
> handlers from
> +    /// declaring `'static` on `dev`, `data`, or `file`.
> +    ///
> +    /// # Safety
> +    ///
> +    /// - `raw_data` must point to a valid, exclusively-owned instance of 
> `Data` for the duration
> +    ///   of the call.
> +    /// - `raw_file` must be a valid pointer to a `struct drm_file`.
> +    #[doc(hidden)]
> +    #[inline(always)]
> +    pub unsafe fn __call_ioctl<

[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but is the #[inline(always)] attribute intended here?

According to the Rust subsystem guidelines, #[inline(always)] should only be
used for functions using build_assert!() that depend on function parameters.

For forwarding abstractions like __call_ioctl(), the standard #[inline]
attribute is preferred since it lacks parameter-dependent build-time
assertions.

> +        'a,
> +        Dev: 'a,
> +        Data: 'a,
> +        F: super::super::file::DriverFile + 'a,
> +        Ret,
> +    >(

-- 
Sashiko AI review ยท 
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=5

Reply via email to