Hello Luca, On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > On Wed Jun 10, 2026 at 7:15 PM CEST, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > > On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 12:04:01PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable > > Hub) wrote: > >> While being less compact, using named initializers allows to more easily > >> see which members of the structs are assigned which value without having > >> to lookup the declaration of the struct. And it's also more robust > >> against changes to the struct definition. > >> > >> The mentioned robustness is relevant for a planned change to struct > >> i2c_device_id that replaces .driver_data by an anonymous union. > >> > >> While touching all these arrays, unify usage of whitespace in the list > >> terminator and drop trailing commas there. > >> > >> This patch doesn't modify the compiled arrays, only their representation > >> in source form benefits. The former was confirmed with x86 and arm64 > >> builds. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) > >> <[email protected]> > > > > who feels responsible to pick up this patch? > > The affected files are mostly in drm-misc so I could apply it, but I think > we'd need an ack from files belonging lsewhere (should be just nouveau and > sitronix at quick glance). > > >> base-commit: 254f49634ee16a731174d2ae34bc50bd5f45e731 > >> prerequisite-patch-id: 7779c63f16ef6f7247cdb71c89e66b27e299eb74 > >> prerequisite-patch-id: 6f920b6f8c31dc0ad1689200c37680755c20ce8b > ... > >> prerequisite-patch-id: 915b7a2276c5a38944107c84bb282271d0bf28f4 > >> prerequisite-patch-id: 76d499a624150588f7ef07dc087e70eca6f33419 > > > > FTR: These are bogous, there are no dependencies, I just wasn't > > attentive enough to drop these lines. > > And 'b4 shazam' messes up because of these lines. > > Overall I think it's better if you resend after splitting by tree, and > removing the prerequisite-patch-id lines. You can keep my R-by on all the > patches if you just split them without further changes.
Thanks for considering to merge, will rework as suggested. Best regards Uwe
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
