Instead of dma_fence_is_signaled_locked() use dma_fence_test_signaled_flag().
The extra polling check seems unecessary for those use cases. Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]> --- drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c | 2 +- include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c index 8df20b0218a9..243991bc1506 100644 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/sw_sync.c @@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ static struct sync_pt *sync_pt_create(struct sync_timeline *obj, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pt->link); spin_lock_irq(&obj->lock); - if (!dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(&pt->base)) { + if (!dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(&pt->base)) { struct rb_node **p = &obj->pt_tree.rb_node; struct rb_node *parent = NULL; diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h index 158cd609f103..803e10ca76e3 100644 --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static inline struct dma_fence *dma_fence_later(struct dma_fence *f1, */ static inline int dma_fence_get_status_locked(struct dma_fence *fence) { - if (dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(fence)) + if (dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(fence)) return fence->error ?: 1; else return 0; -- 2.43.0
