> This smells like the same thing I already fixed with
> commit 3f9de66f8acb ("drm/i915/cdclk: Fix up CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL
> without a full PLL re-enable")

Just tested the latest drm-intel-next branch and it does indeed resolve the
blank screen issue we had encountered.

        [    8.092012] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_cdclk_init_hw [i915]] 
Current CDCLK 624000 kHz, VCO 1248000 kHz, ref 19200 kHz, bypass 19200 kHz, 
voltage level 25
        [    8.092579] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_cdclk_init_hw [i915]] 
Sanitizing CDCLK decimal divider (CDCLK_CTL 0x3104e2, expected 0x3104de)

I therefore rescind my attempt at a fix. Thanks for the quick response. Much
appreciated.

With regards,
Gabríel

________________________________________
De: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Enviado: martes, 23 de junio de 2026 14:24
Para: Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Asunto: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Calculate CDCLK on modeset after sanitizing 
pre-os programming

On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 02:52:29PM +0000, Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson wrote:
> After sanitizing cdclk programming by pre-os, the cdclk frequency is set
> to the lowest supported setting. After which, modesetting needs to
> recalculate the appropriate frequency.
>
> When upgrading the kernel, we encountered an issue where we were left
> with a blank screen at boot on a number of monitors and the following
> message in dmesg:
>
>       i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun
>
> Which bisected to these two commits, depending on the exact monitor used
> during the bisect:
>
>       ba91b9eecb47 ("drm/i915/cdclk: Decouple cdclk from state->modeset")
>       74c31271a1d9 ("drm/i915: Avoid triggering unwanted cdclk changes due to 
> dbuf bandwidth changes")
>
> Although both commits look correct, before they hid the need to explicitly
> trigger CDCLK recalculation after sanitization.

This smells like the same thing I already fixed with
commit 3f9de66f8acb ("drm/i915/cdclk: Fix up CDCLK_FREQ_DECIMAL
without a full PLL re-enable")

Sadly it looks like I forgot to cc:stable it :/

Jani, can you pick that up for -fixes and slap a cc:stable on it?

>
> Signed-off-by: Gabríel Arthúr Pétursson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> index a47736613f6e..5eba50fde396 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> @@ -1267,6 +1267,8 @@ static void skl_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display 
> *display)
>       display->cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0;
>       /* force full PLL disable + enable */
>       display->cdclk.hw.vco = ~0;
> +     /* modesetting may require another cdclk programming */
> +     display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = true;
>  }
>
>  static void skl_cdclk_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -2365,9 +2367,10 @@ static void bxt_sanitize_cdclk(struct intel_display 
> *display)
>
>       /* force cdclk programming */
>       display->cdclk.hw.cdclk = 0;
> -
>       /* force full PLL disable + enable */
>       display->cdclk.hw.vco = ~0;
> +     /* modesetting may require another cdclk programming */
> +     display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = true;
>  }
>
>  static void bxt_cdclk_init_hw(struct intel_display *display)
> @@ -3598,9 +3601,10 @@ static int intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>
>  int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
> +     struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(state);
>       const struct intel_cdclk_state *old_cdclk_state;
>       struct intel_cdclk_state *new_cdclk_state;
> -     bool need_cdclk_calc = false;
> +     bool need_cdclk_calc = display->cdclk.hw.sanitized;
>       int ret;
>
>       ret = intel_cdclk_modeset_checks(state, &need_cdclk_calc);
> @@ -3631,6 +3635,8 @@ int intel_cdclk_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state 
> *state)
>               ret = intel_modeset_calc_cdclk(state);
>               if (ret)
>                       return ret;
> +
> +             display->cdclk.hw.sanitized = false;
>       }
>
>       return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> index 1ff7d078b42c..bae2b7ea2da9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ struct intel_display;
>  struct intel_cdclk_config {
>       unsigned int cdclk, vco, ref, bypass;
>       u8 voltage_level;
> +     bool sanitized;
>       /* This field is only valid for Xe2LPD and above. */
>       bool joined_mbus;
>  };
> --
> 2.54.0
>

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

Reply via email to