Hi, sorry for the noise - adding more udmabuf maintainers in case Vivek
doesn't have time to look into it atm, just to ensure people are aware.
Gerd, Sumit, Christian: this is a simple fix for a minor regression in
the upcoming 7.2 release - it would therefor be great if anyone could
pick it to the fixes branch :)
Thanks and best regards,
Robert
On 29.06.26 13:58, Robert Mader wrote:
On 29.06.26 13:48, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 3:57 PM Robert Mader
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
thanks for the quick review! And no worries, I was very happy about
your
patch, which is why I looked deeper into it in the first place.
Given the patch fixes a newly introduced regression (and is very
simple), do you think there's a chance to still get it into 7.1 - or
would it need to go via the usual 7.2/7.3 release schedule + backport?
Hi Robert,
The timing depends on Vivek and the drm-misc maintainers, not me,
but here's the situation as I understand it:
The original commit 504e2b4ab97a only landed in 7.2 (it went into
drm-misc-next, not drm-misc-fixes). So 7.1 was never affected by
the regression -- there's nothing to fix there.
For 7.2: since your patch fixes a regression introduced in the same
cycle, it would ideally go through drm-misc-fixes to land in 7.2
before release, avoiding a broken commit in the final tree. That's
the cleanest outcome.
Adding Vivek -- he pushed the original patch and would know whether
drm-misc-fixes is the right route at this point in the cycle.
Hi Mikhail, I of course meant 7.2, not 7.1, sorry! And agreed, that
would be ideal / perfect.
--
Robert Mader
Consultant Software Developer
Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718
